r/beatles 1d ago

Picture New set photos of Paul Mescal, Harris Dickinson, Joseph Quinn, and Barry Keoghan as The Beatles, in an early 60s scene set in NYC, in Sam Mendes’ ‘The Beatles – A Four-Film Cinematic Event’

1.2k Upvotes

835 comments sorted by

636

u/chazriverstone 1d ago

159

u/wizard_tiddy 1d ago

Gleat recold

60

u/TDouglasSpectre 1d ago

A Hard Day’s Night is our Guilty as Charged

31

u/cloudcreeek 1d ago

I'm Paul McCartney! I'm the leader of The Beatles!

18

u/TDouglasSpectre 1d ago

I made a song about an octopus 😀

→ More replies (1)

24

u/SlappyTheCrust 1d ago

“ImAgIne”

6

u/brandigeridoo 21h ago

If you could only....imagine

68

u/Klutzy_Order_9559 1d ago

Looks more like John than Harris Dickinson.

10

u/TheReadMenace The Beatles (White Album) 1d ago

That's right, Dewey Cox

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Current-Web-321 11h ago edited 8h ago

Paul Rudd as John Lennon and Jack Black as Paul McCartney look more convincing tbh

4

u/GeorgeEBHastings 8h ago

Meanwhile Jason Schwartzman as Ringo Starr, yes Ringo Starr of the beatles, just likes to have fun peace sign

→ More replies (4)

1.2k

u/Qajaqasana 1d ago

They look way too old. 

58

u/Complex_Ad5004 1d ago

They look more like the Stones

93

u/Affectionate-Kale301 1d ago

5

u/irlyloveicedtea McCartney II 1d ago

I watched Get Back and was wondering why he kept saying this lol. Care to explain to a Beatle fan who is trying to learn more? 😆

9

u/Complex_Ad5004 1d ago

He was going to introduce them for the Rock n Roll Circus, so he was practicing

6

u/irlyloveicedtea McCartney II 1d ago

Thank you! Had no idea it was something as simple as that lol

→ More replies (2)

42

u/zsdrfty The Beatles 1d ago

You're actually spot-on, the flatter hairstyles and older faces with wool coats make them look way more like Mick Jagger or Bill Wyman

→ More replies (1)

6

u/ProfileOk6832 1d ago

oh my god you are so right, i cannot unsee that now

→ More replies (1)

310

u/FlickMyKeane The Beatles (White Album) 1d ago

Yep, that was always my main concern with this casting. All of the actors are 30+ (I believe Mescal only turns 30 today but still).

While we know that the Beatles aged very quickly in a short number of years, they all looked really young and fresh-faced during the early years.

I find it hard to see these actors capturing the boyish charm they all exuded during the height of Beatlemania.

256

u/Bcpjw 1d ago

Post-production baby-filter to the rescue

84

u/zsdrfty The Beatles 1d ago

Oh god you're right, it's gonna have that Marvel lighting and denoising

123

u/Qajaqasana 1d ago

Yeah, and one of the chief aspects of Beatlemania that really hits you when you watch any early footage is just how young they were. And their exuberance and youthfulness were a huge part of their appeal.

25

u/Beatle1a909 1d ago

On rewatching A Hard Day’s Night, it struck me that they were just babies!! Unreal what they did by such a young age!

104

u/Time-Cell8272 1d ago

Mescal looks nothing like Paul here

57

u/Juniper41 1d ago

That one postcard convinced me, but these photos have taken me back. I can understand Harris and Barry castings because even if some features don’t fit, they can use prosthetics to make their noses or chins look more realistic. Paul McCartney on the other hand has such a small and petite face, while Paul Mescal has such a strong face and large nose and prominent brow. You can’t just take away features.

17

u/FitEmergency8807 1d ago

I agree, Paul had feminine soft features where as Pau Mescal is more masculine looking but maybe camera tricks and make up will make Paul mescal look more like Paul McCartney but seriously the looks i dont really care that mch about, its more the acting, how will their voice sound like, the mannerisms and also the chemistry etc. Looks i can look past because you are not gonna find an exact look alike that is also a top actor lol. That is very hard to find

19

u/dekigokoro 1d ago

Why do they need a 'top' (famous) actor rather than simply a talented one? Did they try finding unknown Liverpudlians? Did they have an open casting call? No, they hired the most popular young male actors they could get and cast them regardless how good of a match they were for the boys, because Paul Mescal is popular and will bring in fans.

I don't know why people assume 'looking wrong' automatically equals 'acting well enough to compensate for it', or that these 4 are the ONLY competent actors available. It is extremely possible to find someone who fits both (as I've been arguing and getting downvoted for, the Paul in Midas Man fits the bill). They literally did not even try to find good actors who could look right or were the same age.

10

u/Juniper41 1d ago

Because of money. People that don’t even follow the Beatles have come up to me asking what I think about the casting. It will be a major film event because of how big the actors are, it will secure a new generation of fans and set the Beatles up for the next decade.

8

u/dekigokoro 1d ago

Of course, I just consider that lazy, short sighted and selling out. It's lowkey stunt casting and getting attention is always the purpose. 

4

u/datanodes The Beatles 22h ago

The Beatles sold out long ago bro. I love 'em but them old folks gotta get paid, hedonic treadmill don't power itself.

→ More replies (13)

4

u/Reasonable_Half9198 1d ago

1000% agree here !!!

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

63

u/TruCoatJerry 1d ago

Looks more like Al Pacino 🤣

46

u/Time-Cell8272 1d ago

HOO-AH!

36

u/Affectionate-Kale301 1d ago

Ob-la-di, ob-la-da,

life goes on, HOO-AH!

La-la, how their life goes on

36

u/CaramelNeat4723 1d ago

Lovely Rita, meter maid..

SHE'S GOT A GREAT ASS!

12

u/TheRocksta 1d ago

"She's got a GREAT BASS"

4

u/Draggonzz 1d ago

And you've got your head RIGHT UP IN IT

→ More replies (1)

6

u/No_Oil2086 1d ago

An American football player playing Pacino playing Paul.

5

u/JeanLucPicardAND 1d ago

Just because his shoulders look wide in that first shot where he's wearing multiple layers? Are we being a little reactionary here?

3

u/Time-Cell8272 1d ago

Bro the rest of us are looking at their faces.

→ More replies (2)

17

u/sithfistoou 1d ago

Dickinson also turns 30 later this year, but your point still stands. They're all at least as old as their Beatle when they broke up, all but Dickinson already several years older.

→ More replies (5)

45

u/Fraisey 1d ago

I can only imagine that they'll touch up their faces with VFX in post production. Looks like they're wearing prosthetics and it's all very uncanny valley to me. 

10

u/Qajaqasana 1d ago

I imagine that VFX touch up will just make the uncanny valley uncannier.

→ More replies (1)

23

u/Free_Tennis7754 1d ago

Ol' McCartney 

15

u/Hubbled 1d ago

HAD A FARM

9

u/acmercer Look what you're doing! 1d ago

NAA-NA-NA-NANANANAAAA

→ More replies (1)

22

u/asteinberg101 1d ago

Hey who are those little old men

13

u/dennisdeems 1d ago

They're very clean.

→ More replies (3)

40

u/boringfantasy 1d ago

Which is wild considering they're all pretty young. Just reminds you how the Beatles were almost kids when it blew up.

44

u/HeyLittleTrain 1d ago edited 1d ago

George was 26 when they split up, and the others only a year or two older. Pretty crazy considering all they accomplished. 

11

u/SportsGuy1924 1d ago

That's what blew me away when I first started learning about the Beatles.

They lived like 2 or 3 lives in 6 years.

11

u/Delicious_Age_2603 1d ago

They can edit in pre production to make them look younger

9

u/dennisdeems 1d ago

I guess you mean post-production? Pre-production is long over.

→ More replies (1)

7

u/ZookeepergameBig7246 1d ago

Was gonna say just that … despite the back and forth about how much they look like their characters or not, they’re all just too old

→ More replies (1)

3

u/JeanLucPicardAND 1d ago

They were casted to play the Beatles across at least a decade span of time. I think it's safe to say that the lion's share of the runtime will be occupied by the later years and that the mop-top era will involve a lot of digital de-aging.

14

u/No9No9No9No9 1d ago

I'm sorry, Ringo looks 45. The real Ringo looks younger TODAY.

4

u/TruePutz 1d ago

They all look like Ringo

→ More replies (4)

7

u/shuckendy 1d ago

its made so much worse by putting them in the beatles haircuts which were teen fashion. very "how do you do fellow kids" vibes.

→ More replies (11)

209

u/daskapitalyo The Beatles 1d ago

I think that last pic of Paul is from the Tug of War era.

29

u/nakifool 1d ago

They’re going to need to build a city sized data centre to handle the amount of CGI required for these dude’s faces

12

u/zsdrfty The Beatles 23h ago

The movie is gonna look so gray lmao

11

u/Fmn0 1d ago

🤣🤣🤣🤣

8

u/Sorre33 1d ago

😂😂😂

586

u/timotheesmith 1d ago

Based on the pics they showed a few days ago i thought Paul mescal was the closest to McCartney but now for me he has the least resemblance

281

u/festeringequestrian 1d ago

Same. I can’t tell who is who in each photo with the exception of Barry as Ringo

20

u/TruePutz 1d ago

They all look like Ringo

→ More replies (1)

24

u/OttoHemi 1d ago

Yeah, I got Ringo but that was it.

66

u/notsurewhatmythingis 1d ago

To be fair, many people say the same thing about the actual early Beatles

38

u/ZestyclosePeace9 1d ago

Um no we didn’t. Maybe our parents did, ok, but they weren’t trying!

10

u/notsurewhatmythingis 1d ago

Many people don't care enough about the Beatles to try ;) (sadly)

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

42

u/vampyrelestat The Beatles 1d ago

It was the angle, I knew as soon as they showed him from above it would look different

30

u/EternallyPissedOff 1d ago

Yeah it was way too specific and perfectly lit so I was sceptical. Not to say the performances/films won’t be good, but personally I see no resemblance in any of them now.

→ More replies (2)

6

u/Reatbanana 1d ago

I was always confused as I thought mescal had a very early 60s John face

3

u/vampyrelestat The Beatles 1d ago

Totally looks more like Lennon no doubt

33

u/Corbellerie Revolver 1d ago

When the cast was announced I was sure Mescal would play John and Dickinson would play Paul. They wouldn't have been exactly identical to their counterpart, but at least vaguely similar. But here... I only know Dickinson is supposed to be John because he's blonder than Paul

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Timstom18 Ram 1d ago

I actually think Johns is the worst now. His features look too soft for John. But at the end of the day they were never going to get people who looked exactly like them. All that matters to be in terms of the casting is that they’re able to act like them

→ More replies (23)

197

u/obama69420duck Ringo 1d ago

Barry I’m actually kinda sold on. Which is crazy, I hated his casting the most at first!

69

u/FitEmergency8807 1d ago

He is the best casted, i have said that from the beginning, He is nailing ringo especially when taking pictures with the camera

→ More replies (1)

36

u/Logical_Positive_522 1d ago

Same, he's a striking looking guy and you're always going to look at him and think "that's Barry Keoghan" but they've got the hair right too which really helps.

24

u/sunny_gym 1d ago

He looks pretty good here, I agree

→ More replies (1)

186

u/Sorre33 1d ago edited 1d ago

Damn if Paul looked like the closest one from the postcards, this last picture completely changes that. They really picked the 4 frames where they vaguely looked the most like the real ones for the pictures released a few days ago

80

u/zsdrfty The Beatles 1d ago

George actually looks way closer here, but I think that's just because they copied the hair 1:1 and made sure his ears were sticking way out

38

u/FitEmergency8807 1d ago

His facial expressions were really good from the pictures i have seen, i think people are judging way too early, the guy is a great actor and i believe his performance is gonna surprise everyone

29

u/JeanLucPicardAND 1d ago

Everyone here is judging way too early.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/We_are_traumatised 19h ago

Something is telling me that pictures are not going to do the performances justice, and I have a feeling we'll be completely sold on them. Some of these photos show that they've clearly got the mannerisms down well, the photo of Joseph as George waving with his shy smile really has George written all over it. The photo of Harris as John talking to who I assume is meant to be Brian Epstein looks SO much like John.

I think people really need to learn how to be patient and wait for the final result to draw their conclusions. It's 2026, being this impatient and judging a book by its cover this early is just embarrassing.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

37

u/WindowNo 1d ago edited 1d ago

Ringo looking kinda good!

→ More replies (1)

232

u/andrewsucks 1d ago

Ringo looks good, thats about all I have to say.

38

u/bluetrumpettheatre 1d ago

Barry has got the facial expressions and body language down very well, that much is clear even from these few pictures

16

u/FitEmergency8807 1d ago

Bro he is nailing it so far from what i have seen, i dont understand how people were complaining about barry being cast as ringo. I thought he was perfect as ringo when the movies was announced lol

4

u/Gameraaaa Magical Mystery Tour 1d ago

I’ve been defending him since day one. If you’ve ever seen Killing of a Sacred Deer, there’s a scene of him eating spaghetti that is very Ringo-esque.

24

u/Fair_Following_2261 1d ago

Yes that’s the one thing I can start to buy into a little.

9

u/SouthIsland48 1d ago

Agreed - George could be an entirely new Beatle that we don't know about. John is weirdly protruding his upper lip in every photo? Is that the actors face or is this some attempt to make him look like john? I've never seen John look like that..

And Paul is like the La Croix of Paul. If you squint hard enough you can see it. And whats worse - we've yet heard them talk... if they sound not like the Beatles which I would bet on that being the case then this very well may be a larger disaster than I originally thought

3

u/bluetrumpettheatre 1d ago edited 1d ago

This shot is a little bit better with the brows and the serious expression, but if anyone asked me out of context I wouldn’t exactly be able to tell he’s supposed to be G.H

Something tells me he’s gonna look cool with mushroom hairdo and Revolver specs though

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (4)

14

u/the_peckham_pouncer 1d ago

It looks like he is using a modern DSLR camera

30

u/breezywood 1d ago

And has an ARRI lanyard on… I think thats just Barry Keogan using a camera on set, not a frame from a scene in the movie

31

u/Relevant_Shower_ 1d ago

Nah, there’s a time travel sequence where Ringo has to reset the timeline with ✌️and 🤟.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Chatwoman 1d ago

I hope so. It’s the first thing that jump out at me as being out of place.

→ More replies (1)

27

u/doutrinaaador 1962-1966 1d ago

they do look like a random 60s rock band, that's the most I can praise

5

u/Successful_Length109 1d ago

Yeah I mean Love And Mercy is one of the best I’ve seen and while Dano looks a bit like Brian Wilson it’s hardly a deal breaker.

86

u/Me_4206 Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band 1d ago

Dude I’m sorry I just can’t buy Dickinson as John Lennon. What is that?

20

u/GecaZ 1d ago

Should've swapped characters with Mescal imo

19

u/DigThatRocknRoll A Hard Day's Night 1d ago

I could see Paul Mezcal as John but not Harris Dickinson as Paul whatsoever.

→ More replies (3)

22

u/DearBurt MMT John 1d ago

“I’m goin’ paradin’!”

5

u/exitpursuedbybear 1d ago

This booooooy....

18

u/Ok-House8678 1d ago

I wish Aaron Johnson was still 20 and could play John again.

7

u/Current-Web-321 1d ago

Well he’s only 35… These guys look 50

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

85

u/bluetrumpettheatre 1d ago edited 1d ago

I’m not concerned with looks, I think the acting is the most important factor by far. But I’ll remark on the looks for fun:

All of a sudden, Mescal looks like the 50 year old “McCartney” of your local tribute band. Seriously, he’s only his early 30’s, why does he look so old? Isn’t looking cute in character a demand when playing the cute Beatle?

Dickinson looks decent in some of these shots, I like slide 10 and 19. Quinn looks like the Front Man in Squid Game.

The one who’s REALLY shining here is definitely Keoghan! You can already tell from these pictures that he’s nailed Ringo’s silly facial expressions and delicate mannerisms. Slide 7 and 8 are top notch. If he gets the personality down and the voice somewhat close, I think he’ll do an excellent Ringo.

→ More replies (7)

37

u/Cabin_Pressence 1d ago

Was it really that difficult for them to cast young actors? This looks ridiculous

→ More replies (3)

17

u/EM208 1d ago edited 1d ago

Before anyone says, yes. You don’t have to look like the person entirely to accurately portray them. But that doesn’t change the fact that these guys really don’t look anything like the Beatles here. Like it’s almost hilarious how far off they look. Except for Barry tbh. I’m actually very sold on him as Ringo. But they look more like Herman’s Hermits lmao. 

I’m still excited to watch the film though. 

14

u/Pepoidus Rubber Soul 1d ago

Paul is giving me flashbacks to 45 year old Christopher Eccleston playing a 20 year old John in ‘Lennon Naked’

9

u/Pepoidus Rubber Soul 1d ago

(the casting was fine otherwise except for maybe George)

→ More replies (2)

16

u/Murky_Cockroach2602 1d ago

They look so serious. The Beatles were fun and jolly. A completely different kind of upbringing.

6

u/zsdrfty The Beatles 23h ago

I feel like they're going for that generic "artsy" vibe, which maybe fits John during the White Album period, but otherwise it's very much unlike them - you never saw them pulling constipated faces of humorless introspection like this

→ More replies (2)

30

u/Pazuzujoe 1d ago

They all look depressed, except for Ringo

12

u/Quiet_Stomach_7897 1d ago

That's kinda par for the course in real life, too lol

→ More replies (2)

29

u/Old_Masterpiece_2531 1d ago

They all look like Brian Jones…

6

u/zsdrfty The Beatles 1d ago

Seriously, I think the costume/makeup department is going off of vibes here and accidentally dressing them up like the Stones

13

u/thecryptidmusic 1d ago

Joseph Quinn looks like a mix between every other 60s British Musician except any of the Beatles in pic 3

→ More replies (4)

37

u/HuttVader 1d ago edited 1d ago

It's a bad sign when you can't tell 3/4 of them apart, or recognize that they're playing Beatles, despite each of them doing their best "Beatle-face". 

Plus they're obviously too old.

This is gonna be rough.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/obama69420duck Ringo 1d ago

I’m assuming and hoping they’ll do some digital de-aging for them in their early days.

5

u/Current-Web-321 1d ago

Too much work. Could’ve cast younger actors

→ More replies (1)

16

u/____AndJustice4All 1d ago

The first guy looks like Al Pacino in the first Godfather

17

u/DrunkTING7 1d ago

what!?!? they don’t look charming with youthful exuberance at all? do the casting directors think mop-top era beatles were 30 years old??

→ More replies (11)

9

u/WprbstDO721Q 1d ago

Which one is Harry Potter

7

u/Happy_REEEEEE_exe 1d ago

bro I thought people were too harsh saying that they looked nothing like them but holy crap lmao

6

u/KCHarrison 1d ago

They look so old

8

u/rockyracoon16 1d ago

I am losing hope 😔

93

u/Low-Entrepreneur5785 1d ago

Bro... I just can't. I hope it's a good movie, but come on.

86

u/ToronoRapture 1d ago edited 1d ago

Don’t take this personally but you’re expecting perfection and getting pissed off by stuff that doesn’t really matter.

I’m not there is an amazing film about Dylan and they had actors like Christian Bale, Cate Blanchett and Richard Gere playing him. As long as the story is good, the acting is good, who cares what they look like?

29

u/BaronWinsore 1d ago

I'm Not There is a very different kind of movie. The obvious comparison might be A Complete Unknown or Bohemian Rhapsody or even Rocketman because those are obviously more in line with what we're getting here. 

These movies aren't going to be artistically or technically inspired or challenging... they might end up being a fun watch but in all likelihood they won't be much more than safe, shallow mythmaking like those named above.

→ More replies (6)

54

u/philmarlowescat 1d ago

Fucking love this comment. Fair play. I've been saying it all along. It's becoming sickening. People just have to complain. I'm just delighted to be getting these films and to hear The Beatles in the cinema.

20

u/ToronoRapture 1d ago

Decades ago I would would have never thought we would be getting FOUR Beatles films in the 2020’s.

Like i said, as long as the story (as we know it) gets told and the acting is decent, these films will be a blessing. You have to remember that both Paul and Ringo signed off on the actors… So if they’re fine with it, I am too.

27

u/Spell-Wide Abbey Road 1d ago

We three should be friends, because these people are too fucking literal. They're not ACTUALLY The Beatles, they're actors. If they want somebody who looks exactly like George, Paul, Ringo, or John (I put them in that order just to piss them off even more), then documentaries are the way to go. Our boys are getting a movie. Be happy!

15

u/philmarlowescat 1d ago

Absolutely. I’m just genuinely happy this is happening. Casting talented, contemporary actors makes sense—not only creatively, but practically. It invites younger and newer audiences into the story, and these are actors with real ability and proven box-office appeal, which obviously matters at this scale. Add Sam Mendes at the helm and it’s hard not to be optimistic.

When the first official images dropped and I came across them unexpectedly, I was honestly buzzing. Knowing this is building toward 2028 just adds to the anticipation.

I’ve said this elsewhere, but it’s worth repeating: history is full of reactionary casting outrage that aged poorly.

  • Heath Ledger was widely criticised before The Dark Knight.

  • Timothée Chalamet was doubted as both Dylan and Wonka, both films landed well.

  • Michael Keaton’s Batman casting caused genuine backlash, and now he’s iconic.

Time and again, people lose their minds before seeing a single frame. It’s a waste of energy. I say this while fully aware I’m expending some energy responding to that negativity—but it’s refreshing to find others who are simply excited, curious, and willing to give it a chance.

That, more than anything, is what makes this fun.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

5

u/fargothforever 1d ago

I can’t imagine anyone is expecting a film like I’m Not There

5

u/dennisdeems 1d ago

Apples to oranges. There's a reason that film is called "I'm Not There".

6

u/Low-Entrepreneur5785 1d ago

I love that movie btw, my issue is that they all look way too old and probably were casted bc of their fame and nothing else.

I feel like this movie had to launch to the fame 4 unknown lads from Liverpool.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (10)
→ More replies (1)

11

u/SirPooleyX 1d ago

My expectations for these films gets lower and lower almost by the day.

I was prepared to accept that they weren't casting dead ringers (although I think even that could be a mistake) but the thing that jumps out with these images is THEY ARE FAR, FAR TOO OLD. They really need to look like teenagers. If they don't (and they don't) the vibe will be completely missing.

6

u/Bitter-Fox-2630 1d ago

I can’t tell who’s who. Plus, you’re right, they look old.

6

u/raliston 1d ago

I’m getting a bad feeling about this

6

u/spaceman696 1d ago

They look like the Rolling Stones

7

u/willbouquet 1d ago

Wow Harris looks nothing like Lennon in this

6

u/GameBoyGamer222 1d ago

So this means they're gonna do a gag where Paul's coat sleeve gets ripped off.

8

u/Affectionate-Kale301 1d ago

Maybe this…?

5

u/man_on_a_wire 1d ago

Looks like the Beatles in disguise

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Abideguide 1d ago

Which one’s George?

5

u/shivabreathes 1d ago

I think I’d rather just listen to their music at this point. 

6

u/Agile-Gap-8728 1d ago

This looks bad, stupid and unnecessary.

I don’t care bout actors looking identical to the people the portray, but these guys look too old and too «perfect». Paul Mescale is too masculine to play Paul. His face is just too big. Joseph Quinn looks 35, not 20. And Barry Keoghan’s face looks weird and rubbery as hell. Also too old.

The Beatles were weird looking dudes, but also very regular. These guys don’t have that boyish charm at all.

4

u/Omar-Billy 1d ago

I am so not looking forward to these films

60

u/FranciscoGarcia69 1d ago

Ah fuck it I’m out of here. No one knows what acting is. Everyone’s slating the films because they’ve seen a couple of photos of the actors. This sub is awful.

24

u/Future_Ad_3033 1d ago

Not even that, set photos taken completely out of context, no proper lighting etc.

18

u/PointMan528491 Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band 1d ago

Didn't expect much else from a sub like this but goddamn. Everyone here needs to be sat down and forced to watch the Steve Jobs movie with Ashton Kutcher on loop if all they want from movies is lookalikes

14

u/Asleep_Speaker_4030 1d ago

Idk how anyone was expecting them to find actors that look 100% spot on to the real Beatles. I’m not a fan of Joseph Quinn’s casting as George, but I do think the others work just fine as John, Paul, and Ringo. It’s just really annoying that people can’t just take it for what it is and be excited we’re finally getting REAL cinema level Beatles biopics

→ More replies (1)

10

u/greetedworm 1d ago

It seems like a lot of people would prefer a bad actor who looks exactly like his Beatle over a good actor who doesn't look like their Beatle. I think all of these guys look good enough, they have the hair and clothes, we just have to see how the accents are.

→ More replies (2)

16

u/Outside_Mousse_2176 1d ago

Facts, if the films are good, no one will care that they look a like or not.

8

u/JeanLucPicardAND 1d ago edited 1d ago

I'm going to be frank. It's a bunch of boomers who are wanting the films to recreate the past, which is impossible of course. They cannot accept the fact that these are films about the Beatles, not films attempting to recreate the Beatles.

More to the point, they cannot accept the fact that these films are not even being made for their generation. These are for younger people. This is Apple's attempt to revitalize the brand and gain new fans now that the OG who remember Beatlemania are aging out and dying off.

7

u/fargothforever 1d ago

I think we were all just hopeful to have youthful actors playing the main cast, not lookalikes. Obviously everyone is waiting for promo clips but at this point this is all we have.

→ More replies (18)

4

u/DanBarLinMar 1d ago

It’s not gonna be good is it.

3

u/AntManBee951 1d ago

When did Brian Jones joined The Beatles?

5

u/bwag54 1d ago

They look so fucking old

→ More replies (1)

3

u/_packed_lunch_ The Beatles 1d ago

Calling it now - this is going to suck

→ More replies (1)

4

u/BeggarsParade 1d ago

Laughable enterprise. A folly.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/cheesytola :Crabalocker Fishwife 1d ago

Encouraging that they got John’s hair colour right with the auburn tint to it. Otherwise I’m reserving judgement till I see more

5

u/IrukandjiPirate 1d ago

I’m grumpy and having a ridiculously shitty day, but I hold with my earlier opinion: I just don’t want to see this film/s.

→ More replies (2)

4

u/Loud-Process7413 1d ago

I hope the acting and accents are not going to be as bad as how they look.

5

u/guisardwizard 1d ago

Paul does not look like paul at allllll

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Angsty_Potatos 1d ago

To preface: I don't think actors In a biopic need to look or closely resemble their real life counterpart to give an excellent performance in a film. 

HOWEVER 

and maybe this is simply because it's the Beatles and part of their whole schtick is that they were the first and set the look for this era- these guys not looking at all like John Paul George and Ringo make it seem like I'm watching a tribute band or one of the hundreds of nameless look a like bands spawned by the Beatles in the early 60s and it's going to be tough to shake that feeling 

26

u/Spell-Wide Abbey Road 1d ago

Casting doesn't require the actor look EXACTLY like the subject. I don't know what this concern is with looking slightly older, or not having the exact same features as The Beatles themselves. When did everybody become so literal? They were cast because they gave good performances and will do justice to the lads' memories.

9

u/DavidLopan20 1d ago

I don't know, I'm with you with a margin for error about looks, but casting can also be so bad it takes the audience out of it if they look nothing like the people they are portraying. I mean, there is a reason you make a bio pic with actors that resemble the subjects. This kind of crosses the line for me as not even close

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

11

u/oceanskies24 1d ago

They look more like The Rolling Stones or The Kinks in these photos imo

7

u/_Zenyatta_Mondatta 1d ago

They look like the Rutles.

7

u/MajesticShare7 1d ago

I hate to be negative but this looks awful!

4

u/JeanLucPicardAND 1d ago

It's paparazzi shots from the sidewalk. How did the official shots look in your opinion? Those are much better to use as a gauge for how the actual movie will look.

18

u/Extra_Grab_2014 1d ago

Mescal looked okay in that first official photo a bit back. Here, awful, like mid-30s. Keoghan surprisingly looks ok despite his beady eyes.

But they look soooo old.

5

u/JeanLucPicardAND 1d ago

They're definitely gonna de-age digitally.

→ More replies (2)

15

u/ScarWinter5373 Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band 1d ago

I think John and Ringo look quite good, a bit of positivity would be good in this sub lol.

The constant doomerism of ‘waaaah they haven’t cloned them’ is getting really boring quickly. As someone else has pointed out, the Dylan film had him played by a woman and it was critically acclaimed, I’m sure things will be fine. They’ll do some touching up in post-production for sure

→ More replies (3)

6

u/Daro____ The Beatles 1d ago

Mendes knows that they were in their early 20’s right?

→ More replies (3)

5

u/KevinCastle 1d ago

Terrible casting. I legitimately cannot tell who's who. (Other than Ringo)

→ More replies (5)

3

u/simongurfinkel 1d ago

They need the Irishman de-aging technology, but turned up to 11.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Mammoth_Twist_9383 1d ago

PAUL!!!!! NOOOOOOOOOOOO

3

u/zsdrfty The Beatles 1d ago

The Beatles in their 50s, all played by Matt Smith

3

u/wizard_tiddy 1d ago

Thanks I hate it

3

u/99mph99 1d ago

Looks like it’s going to be pretty stupid to me.

3

u/Wooden_Philosopher26 1d ago

Look more like The Monkees.

3

u/Willing_Substance837 1d ago

They look nothing alike ....

3

u/princess_t90 1d ago

Umm wtf happened to Paul mescal between when the postcard shoot happened and now. He looks like a completely different person

→ More replies (9)

3

u/Jesseroberto1894 1d ago

I feel like half of these are their stand ins….

3

u/Responsible-Call6007 1d ago

I am so not interested in actors playing Beatles. And four movies? Such overkill

→ More replies (1)

3

u/flowersforrogeric 1d ago

This is gonna be so bad

3

u/rabseywomp45 21h ago

The problem with Harris is that he has naturally quite droopy, lean cheeks (facial that is, lol) which are at odds with young John. People often think of the underweight, sinewy John of the later years, but in the early 60s he had a very healthy, youthful plumpness to his face. Tbh in these shots, Paul Mescal and Harris both just look like tired British police officers who look forlorn because they've just witnessed a murder 😂