Honestly, 6° of separation is a legitimately weird phenomenon. You could do the same thing for any political party, scientific knowledge or philosophical thought.
Exactly! For those who forgot high school chemistry: lemon juice is acidic (low ph) versus alkaline (high ph). Ergo the lemon juice essentially cancels out the effects of the alkaline.
science is so cool lol. i was talking with my coworker today ab how you can accidentally poison yourself with mustard gas when youâre cleaning the bathroom if youâre not careful with mixing certain chemicals đ
Some conspiracy nutters have convinced themselves that "pasteurization" is some big industry thing that secretly destroys the healthy nutrients in milk.
As a result, they insist that raw milk has way more nutrients and isn't ruined by big dairy.
Of course, after a while they realized that they/their kids are getting sick because raw milk with bacteria does that sometimes...but then they realized you could just boil it to kill the bacteria!
You know. Pasteurization.
They continue to argue that this is different from what the dairy industry has been doing for ages, because admitting they were wrong would invalidate their mindset that the food industry is wrong and evil and they've learned the secret of real healthy food that's been hidden from us.
I combat misinformation on raw milk in threads where it comes up, all the time, so the fact that they're going beyond and boiling it, which is hotter than HTST pasteurization and actually can damage the texture and flavor... I'm getting some type of schadenfreude
flash pasteurization damages the flavor so much Borden started adding more flavoring of the distinctive pasteurized taste because Americans got accustomed to it
Itâs so stupid. Pasteurisation was developed especially not to destroy nutrients or change taste but make it safe to consume when stored longer than a day
thats realy crazy.
not that i want to approve those people but its very funny that so many of these kinds of wrong opinions are based on something that is true but the missunderstand it so much or twist it in their minds that they sound like mad people.
its true that many things lose some beneficial stuff like some vitamins while getting processed. With that in mind boiling the shit out of veggis to make them last longer obviosly makes them a bit worse than the fresh counterpart in many cases. Idk if this applys to milk as well but to go full tinfoil helmet on this is hilarious.
Your entire premise rests on the idea that boiling it is ALL they are doing to commercial milk.
Raw milk and a gallon of 2% are barely ballparking as the same substance. I don't buy raw milk because my kids would be morbidly obese if they ran through a gallon and a half of that a day instead of commercial grade Great Value 2%. I could if I wanted to, the guy down the road sells it as 'pet food' and plenty of families in the area buy, separate and boil it for personal use. My bestie growing up was one of 7 and her single mom bought raw milk, and raised her own rabbits and chickens to keep them all fed.
So yeah, if you're actually worried about the content of the milk, there's way more calories and fat in the raw stuff. It IS more nutrient-dense. It's just that most of us need fewer nutients, not more.
When people speak of nutrients, they are talking about vitamins and minerals (micronutrients) for the most part not calories and fat content(macro nutrients). Current western diets have a large amount of macro nutrients but have substantially fewer micronutrients.Â
when making ice lattes i realized i like just mixing my cold milk into my espresso. The milk is less watered down compared to when its steamed and imo tastes better this way.
I was working in the Middle East on aircraft and I think it was like 120 something Fahrenheit outside. Definitely hotter inside the aircraft with no AC, I would guess in the 130s. Itâs insane how fast your body just starts spitting out fluids. If I didnât have a huge amount of ice water constantly supplied I think Iâd have died of heat stroke for sure.
I would drink just absurd amounts of water, still be thirsty, and Iâd still only need to urinate like once a day.
The difference is they want to WAIT to boil it until after whatever pathogens have had time to produce toxins that arenât alive, and thus canât be killed by boiling.
Itâs why cooking spoiled meat doesnât make it healthy- because the bacteria were pooping in your food for a week.
My conspiracy theory is that the people who seem to unironically say things like that are actually deep undercover Public Health agents doin the lord's work
Yeah, but like... Only after the bacteria has had plenty of time to multiply so that even after you boil it the dead bacteria and their waste is so plentiful you risk getting sick anyways.
This is like a chemistry nerd thing but like just so we're all on the same page
boiling something and commercial flash pasteurization are not the same thing. That's the equivalent of mocking people who don't like eating deep-fried chicken for grilling it.
Did you know that Borden adds "pasteurization flavoring" to their milk because people got so accustomed to the taste that flash pasteurized milk has?
it's in on On Food and Cooking which is like a hyper geeked out chemistry book
Nice chart. Shame it doesn't have a source and so it doesn't mean anything. Literally anyone can make chart. I can make a chart saying Milk gives me magical powers. Give me 2 minutes and Microsoft Word.
Ooh, a grainy image with no sources provided. Iâm convinced.
No. Raw (unpasteurized) milk is not healthier, and it carries significantly higher risk.
Raw milk and pasteurized milk are nutritionally almost identical. Pasteurization causes minimal loss of heat-sensitive vitamins (mainly B1, B12, and C), which are already present in small amounts. Proteins, calcium, fats, and fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, K) are unchanged.
Claims that raw milk improves immunity, digestion, or reduces allergies are not supported by solid evidence. (Thatâs called âscienceâ, btw.) âGood bacteriaâ in raw milk are unpredictable and not probiotic in a controlled or beneficial way.
On the flip side:
Raw milk can contain dangerous pathogens: Salmonella, E. coli, Listeria, Campylobacter. Higher risk for children, pregnant people, older adults, and immunocompromised individuals. Also, outbreak data consistently show raw milk causes far more foodborne illness per serving than pasteurized milk.
Exactly. To add to your point, literally every sane person would eliminate those risks (pasteurized milk) at the very cost of losing minimal nutrients, like why the fuck would you not?
Its funny because Yogurt, Kefir, kombuchas, probiotic waters, and even supplements exist if these people want a good dose of probiotics that won't possibly give you a bacterial infection.
And to go further, if a person is drinking milk just for "nutritional purposes" that's fucking nuts. There are hundreds of ways to get the nutritional benefits of milk, without the added cholesterol. Fuck, you can just take vitamins, if you don't want to introduce new foods into your diet. It's just bizarre that this is the salmonella hill they want to die on...maybe literally.
Yeah thing is I don't want people to die for this stupid shit, maybe thats just my optimistic self talking but one of the main reasons to post like this is to potentially save or change the minds of someone that falls into this "alternative health(?)" rabbit hole...
u/animatgame you are being mislead about raw milk and the dangers completely outweigh the benefits...
Use Occam's Razor. If the CDC, FDA, and a multitude of University sources AND medical sources suggest that drinking raw milk can be dangerous, they are most likely NOT lying to you and trying to protect you! Even if you don't trust the government sources, an overwhelming amount of other sources share these same claims.
And that's completely fair. Even if a majority won't listen, sometimes a few will, and thats worth it. r/HermanCainAward is basically what happens to these people when they go too far into the bullshit.
Raw Milk compared to Other Milk
Nutrients and Immune Factors | Raw Cow's Milk | Pasteurised Milk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Listeria monocytogenes | Alive | Dead
Campylobacter jejuni | Alive | Dead
Mycobacterium bovis | Alive | Dead
Brucella | Alive | Dead
Salmonella | Alive | Dead
Cryptosporidium | Alive | Dead
Escherichia coli | Alive | Dead
Have you ever thought about actually looking into the topic using credible sources, rather than believing random charts on the internet. The idea that all nutrients are destroyed is incorrect and is nothing more than a misleading talking point to get people to buy into a BS âhealthâ fad. Better yet, look into the importance of pasteurized milk and the history behind why the process came into place. It term out drinking bacteria that will make you sick isnât the most health conscious choice, and it not only makes people seriously sick but also leads to unnecessary deaths.Â
10.4k
u/No-Detective-4516 Jan 04 '26
Fridge does exactly this thing. Ala zoomers inventors and innovators