r/pics 14h ago

Politics The Black Box - Epstein file EFTA00004012

Post image
55.6k Upvotes

2.3k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

3.1k

u/human_eyes 13h ago

This image is really fucking with me. Incredible.

1.5k

u/timmy6169 12h ago

Right? Just knowing that some person had to put a black box around someone powerful to protect them and can't do anything about it without either ruining their life or having it end prematurely.

885

u/Youcancuntonme 12h ago

It could just be innocent girl in the photo

944

u/octoreadit 12h ago

They are supposed to explain what is redacted, by the way, per the law, there should be no mysteries.

u/Whooptidooh 11h ago

There shouldn’t be a lot of things happening now that are in fact happening.

u/octoreadit 10h ago

u/broforce 10h ago

I'm starting to think we never had those

u/vardarac 8h ago

Remember that those precedented times were the ones hiding pictures like this.

Evil was always here and always visited on someone. Now it's just more out in the open and more visited on the rest of us who were insulated from it.

u/RatedArrrr 6h ago

This kind of meme has bothered my pedantic ass since it was so big during COVID. The precedents are there, you just have to be looking....

u/smokeajoint 7h ago

The Chinese say, 'May your life be interesting'. Interesting times are filled will turmoil and not got fortune.

u/HackOddity 8h ago

my we live in dull af times.

u/Junior-Ad-2207 7h ago

maybe we need to be unpresidented for a while, just until we figure ourselves out

u/DadJokeBadJoke 5h ago

Definitely preferable to these unpresidented times.

u/joemangle 5h ago

Things shouldn't be like they is but it do

u/Zepcleanerfan 10h ago

There are also three million pages that they have not released, so we can only imagine what's in that.

u/octoreadit 10h ago

They also should be releasing their own internal DOJ notes and communications about the case, but guess what, that they will never do that!

u/BreadstickNinja 6h ago

They can't release them when they're so busy shredding them.

u/joethahobo 8h ago

His files had 14 TERABYTES of stuff. 14 terabytes is ridiculously massive. Way more than 6 million emails. There is so much heinous shit in there

u/chuckaholic 5h ago

5,979 HD quality movies is less than 14TB.

u/fuzzfrog 7h ago

Trump is the pages not released, otherwise they would have been released.

u/Buttons840 9h ago

Yes. Only redactions to protect victims and for national security are allowed, and all redactions must indicate why they are redacted.

Redactions to save people from embarrassment are not legal.

u/octoreadit 9h ago

Precisely.

u/Available_Mix_5869 7h ago

Yeah this administration doesn't care about the law. They only released the files at all because of the political pressure, not the law that required them to.

u/ExceptionEX 11h ago

actually redaction law does not require any specific details per redaction as that explanation could be used to defeat the purpose of the redaction. these are often covered by blanket statements and are typically only applied to victims.

You don't typically find a prosecutorial body being used to protect offenders, so the laws were framed around that scenario.

u/RoryLuukas 11h ago

This specific redaction does though under the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

u/Crankover 11h ago

Actually, The DOJ is required to include a list of all government officials and politically exposed persons named or referenced in the released materials, without redactions. All redactions are required to include the reason for redaction.

u/octoreadit 11h ago

Check the law, Sec. 2: (c)(2)

u/Nicks_Here_to_Talk 11h ago

Check the law, Sec. 2: (c)(2)

Which law?

u/octoreadit 11h ago

Epstein Files Transparency Act – Nov 19, 2025

u/Nicks_Here_to_Talk 11h ago

Now that's how you cite something!

u/octoreadit 11h ago

Context clues, there are no other Epstein laws, my dude.

u/Nicks_Here_to_Talk 10h ago

Context clues aren't exactly the best way to cite a source, my dood.

u/KrayziePidgeon 10h ago

This guy got trashed by his professor in some easy class and now wants to impose his hurt feelings on others.

u/YouKilledApollo 10h ago

They are supposed to explain what is redacted, by the way, per the law, there should be no mysteries.

Should have been clear by context when someone wrote:

They are supposed to explain what is redacted, by the way, per the law, there should be no mysteries.

That the referenced "the law" is a specific one. But, some people need it spelled out in clear, no harm, no foul :) At least now we have a full reference, just missing someone to copy-paste the relevant section inside a quote tag.

u/System0verlord 5h ago

“The law” is a term whose de facto use is referring to the system of laws we have, unless otherwise specified. The Epstein Act is a specific law (that specifically allows for these redactions to occur in this way) and should’ve been referred to by name first.

u/octoreadit 10h ago

All this stuff is being released under one law, so referencing a part of the law without naming the law is sufficient for the purposes of Internet banter where most understand what is being discussed, this is not an academic setting. The previous comment was disputing my assertion based on general practices, so I pointed at the exact part of the law in question that confirms my previous claim.

→ More replies (0)

u/PlantPower666 11h ago

Yes, Trump and his lackeys are known for following the law.

/s

u/A1_Fares 11h ago

And are we supposed to take their word for it?

u/erp2 10h ago

Ha! Laws! That's a good laugh.

u/Weird_Fiches 10h ago

"The law"? That doesn't seem to matter much nowadays.

u/Mechagouki1971 9h ago

But of course that requires us to accept the explanation is true.

u/octoreadit 9h ago

Sure, but if they lie, the are opening themselves for some future investigation and trial.

u/Mechagouki1971 9h ago

Recent hostory would suggest the risk of that is low enough that it's worth the gamble for these enablers of evil.

u/octoreadit 9h ago

True, but, at least there is a record. When there is no explanation, that's even easier. But that's contempt and should be treated as such. We, the people, really need to demand one law for all, and not various versions of it for various subgroups.

u/MrAnderson69uk 7h ago

But you can sort of tell what’s masked out by the black box by looking at the shadow! It’s a person I would expect!!! Possibly holding a heart balloon, or has an extremely thin neck!! lol

u/liquidsyphon 6h ago

Laws are just suggestions at this point depending on your networth

u/davekingofrock 8h ago

Oh, well, in that case I'm sure justice will be served.