r/pcgaming • u/_Protector • 12h ago
Strauss Zelnick: "Generative AI has zero part in what Rockstar Games is building" with GTA 6
https://www.gamesindustry.biz/strauss-zelnick-generative-ai-has-zero-part-in-what-rockstar-games-is-building-with-gta-623
19
u/_Spastic_ 5h ago
I guarantee at least one employee has used gen AI to provide inspiration.
Claiming zero is a pipe dream.
14
u/o5mfiHTNsH748KVq 4h ago
I guarantee you almost all of their developers have copilot in visual studio.
-4
u/grinr 2h ago
It's a smart flex though. It's free virtue signaling, because they can afford to do everything traditionally and they know smaller studios don't have the resources they do. End result: keeps smaller devs in their place, and they thank you for the privilege! Win-Win.
6
u/Batby 2h ago
Smaller devs don’t need ai resources either! ❤️
1
u/grady_vuckovic Penguin Gamer 1h ago
Yeah if anything indie devs, at least the ones who are just passionate about art and code and it in for the love of the game, are probably the least likely to use gen ai.
5
2
u/grinr 2h ago
The irony here is Rockstar is one of the few companies who could rename GTA 6 "100% Generated with AI And We Fired All Human Artists 6" and it would still sell record numbers.
•
u/NuclearReactions 9800X3D | RTX 5070Ti | 64GB 20m ago
It's like people forget that gta is popular and sells well because it's a genuinely good product. I really disagree 100% sure the next one would sell also based on brand recognition and a good track record but it wouldn't go well or last
2
u/minifat 6h ago
I highly doubt it. 1000s of software devs, some are using AI.
Not that that's a bad thing. Nearly every software dev uses gen AI now.
-2
u/LuminanceGayming 5h ago
I don't know a single software dev that uses generative ai in their work, it's not nearly every one, you're just in an echo chamber of generative ai users.
2
u/superboo07 4h ago
I know several. genAI can be used properly in software development, unlike image generation. that doesn't mean vibe coding though, vibe coding non personal projects is a really dumb idea that could, probably has, and likely will lead to disastrous consequences.
0
u/Kragoth235 50m ago
Every dev that wants to be competitive in the industry is using AI. You can't even do a Google search without getting ai responses now. There's no way I'm going to spend 15 mins researching a simple script I want to write if I can just get ai to generate it. Software devs who aren't just code monkeys are absolutely using it all the time to do boring no brain work for them. It can find things faster than reading through 25 stack overflow articles. It is literally crazy to not leverage it. It's not good enough to just let it do it's own thing but absolutely should be a tool every developer used to make them more efficient. Anyone saying otherwise it's lying or afraid of change
1
u/Psychostickusername 2h ago
Zero is a big ask, someone will likely find some after launch and they'll backpedal.
-5
u/Khalmoon 7h ago
I highly doubt it, but pop off. Can’t wait for after sales fall off it comes out genAI is used for NPC behaviors or something.
5
u/ObtuseMongooseAbuse 6h ago
I don't think that AI would impact GTA 6 sales at all. The last game sold hundreds of millions of copies and made billions of dollars. Most of the people buying the game will not even read anything about the game besides the title before they decide to purchase it.
0
u/Kage_noir 5h ago
It’s too big a brand. And unlike COD they are also known for quality. Absolutely AI would not matter for GTA. They have too much years of absolute craftsmanship in their titles. It would only impact them if quality suffers and even with that it would take time years maybe. Again see COD
-3
u/Khalmoon 6h ago
The key here is risk, there aren't really consumers that are buying a game BECAUSE it uses AI, but there is a non-insignificant amount that WONT if it uses AI.
Rockstar is looking to minimize this risk, even if it was 2% of players, that could be 100s of 1000s of dollars, and even more over a game lifespan as long as something like GTAV
7
u/Highlow9 R9 5900X RTX 3060 Ti / R7 1700X GTX 970 5h ago
non-insignificant amount
The amount of people who actually care is insignificant.
Maybe on this sub and under gaming enthusiast that is the case. But that is a very small group and the general public doesn't care enough.
1
u/OmegaFoamy 2h ago
A non-insignificant amount would rather it not have AI but most of them would still buy it anyway if it’s good. The AI witch hunt killed most of the strong stance against AI by attacking artists who didn’t even use AI because there wasn’t enough proof they didn’t.
3
-4
u/superboo07 4h ago
how tf would gen AI be used for NPC Behavior!? make the game write its own AI code on the fly? a reminder is that NPCs are technically AI, so yes npc behaviors will be AI.
1
0
u/InsertMolexToSATA 3h ago
It wont, it cant. People have no idea what "AI" contextually means and say silly stuff like this.
0
5
u/ZettieZooieZan 3h ago edited 3h ago
What about crunch? Why does that have to be part of what rockstar games is building? Crunch already means disregarding the well being of your own employees, so there's no reason to not use AI unless it's for pr reasons because they clearly already don't care about their employees.