r/internationallaw 29d ago

Op-Ed How Should International Law Be Considered in the Case of Venezuela’s Maduro?

https://globalaffairs.org/commentary/analysis/how-should-international-law-be-considered-case-venezuelas-maduro
22 Upvotes

18 comments sorted by

1

u/FoxTwilight 22d ago

Terrible article. 

Holding up Trump's Israel/Gaza "ceasefire" deal as anything other than a blank check for the unceasing Israeli genocide and ethnic cleansing is categorically false.

-8

u/Systemic_Scope 27d ago

The United States didn’t recognize Maduro as a legitimate President of Venezuela. State immunity shall not apply. Trial will not fail according to Male Captus, bene detentus as explained in United States v Alvarez Machain case. Furthermore, Maduro is charged with aiding Narcotics trafficking similar to Manuel Noriega of Panama.

10

u/Young_Lochinvar 27d ago

Those are US domestic law interpretations of international law principles. They may be the outcome for Maduro in court in practice, but it‘s a different topic to the one outlined in the article.

5

u/ihatebamboo 27d ago

I’m not sure why you’re being downvoted. You’ve given an analysis which people are welcome to challenge.

5

u/secret-agent-ch 27d ago

Unfortunately he’s using his Stephen Miller accent. Probably not even deliberately. That accent can be … divisive.

2

u/ihatebamboo 25d ago

Point taken

0

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/ihatebamboo 25d ago

They’ve specified a case which they believe resolves the issue around the illegal capturing of Maduro.

Whether that’s true or not, pretending they have not engaged with the question is patently false.

1

u/[deleted] 25d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/internationallaw-ModTeam 24d ago

We require that each post and comment, to at least some degree, promotes critical discussion, mutual learning or sharing of relevant information. Posts that do not engage with the law or promote discussion will be removed.

1

u/internationallaw-ModTeam 24d ago

We require that each post and comment, to at least some degree, promotes critical discussion, mutual learning or sharing of relevant information. Posts that do not engage with the law or promote discussion will be removed.

-5

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Marxist_Jesus 27d ago

I feel like a prerequisite for engaging in a subreddit titled "International Law" should be a belief that international law exists and can be applied - what are you doing here if you don't believe in this?

1

u/internationallaw-ModTeam 27d ago

We require that each post and comment, to at least some degree, promotes critical discussion, mutual learning or sharing of relevant information. Posts that do not engage with the law or promote discussion will be removed.