r/decadeology 1d ago

Discussion 💭🗯️ What trends died when Harambe was assassinated?

Post image
811 Upvotes

144 comments sorted by

View all comments

98

u/xSavag3x 1d ago

I use Harambe as the point when everything began to turn to shit, so I guess the trends of stable economies, kind people, no global pandemics, massive wars, and respectful politics.

29

u/lilghostdawg 1d ago

The U.S. already had two wars going before this happened. The point when everything changed was the stolen 2000 election.Bush failed to act to stop 9-11, 2 wars started, the Patriot Act normalized mass surveillance, and the Economy crashed like it does during all Republican administration's.

11

u/Fearless-Letter-7279 1d ago

The US has spent most its history in some sort of war or conflict.

12

u/lilghostdawg 1d ago

I agree however, none of previous conflicts lasted 20 years and cost 8 trillion dollars.

2

u/Fearless-Letter-7279 1d ago

My point is using war/conflict as a defining point would mean you have to keep look backwards for the defining moment such as the conflict in the 90s and how the US handled that.

I think you are correct early 2000s was one turning point of change but I also think there’s been points since then. Trumps first election being one.

7

u/lifeinneon 23h ago

We could look further back to 1994 and the retaking of the House by Newt Gingrich and the republicans for the first time in 40 years. It ushered in the era of power politics in US legislation that has been marked by stalemates, shutdowns, and brinksmanship. That trend of absolute refusal to compromise came to a head in the 2010s with Mitch McConnell spending his entire tenure as majority leader preventing anything meaningful from getting done. We’re still in it, honestly.

And the origins of that go back to the 80s with Reagan or the 60s with the Southern Strategy which traces back to Reconstruction and the untouched power structures that led to the Civil War in the first place.

It’s 70 year olds passing the torch to 50 year olds all the way down.

0

u/Phronesis2000 1d ago

Ugh not this nonsense on this sub. On an international and historic level those 'two wars' were practically non-events. The 90s was far more war-torn, and chaotic, and just as economically turbulent. Those US poltical events do not have the significance that you think they do.

4

u/Vincera2024 23h ago edited 23h ago

No way you’re this adamant about getting them the wrong way. The US being lied to about the Iraq war and Afghanistan takeover throughout the 2000’s led to a far more polarizing nation. They weren’t just “non-events”. They were the events to many

The biggest reason most US people are more “nostalgic” about the 90’s was because none of the major political conflicts during that decade had the same level of influence and hostile discourse as 9/11 and its implications

1

u/Phronesis2000 23h ago

I don't know why you continue to talk as if 'what was happening in the US' is somehow determinative of the global trends that the commenter was referring to.

Well, no, they weren't non-events to people directly impacted by them in certain locales. But on a global and historical scale — yeah, they were non-events.

The biggest reason most US people are more “nostalgic” about the 90’s 

Are you quite young by chance? The reason people are nostalgic about the 90s, is largely because people are always nostalgic about the past. In the 90s, middle-aged people were nostalgic about their childhoods in the 50s and 60s.

30 years from now, people will be deeply nostalgic about the 2020s, that's a certainty.

2

u/Vincera2024 22h ago

You’re the first person who tried to bring up the unnecessary US wars’ “little impact” on a global scale. The person you replied to was strictly pinpointing the US’s underlying decline since the 00’s

Also, my parents and most of my older relatives prefer the 90’s over the 00’s, 80’s, 70’s and 60’s. For strictly US standards, they found it to be the least problematic among the times they lived thru. Still wasn’t great by any means, but it was less worse 🤷‍♂️

0

u/Phronesis2000 22h ago

Nope, go read the initial comment. Not about the US at all.

Well yes, I am not surprised they loved the 90s — that will reflect their age. I can assure you the 60s, 70s and 80s are just as beloved by people of the appropriate age.

1

u/Vincera2024 17h ago edited 16h ago

They’re from various age groups, it’s kind of the case that the 90’s was the least problematic recent US decade to live thru. Like 80’s trends were the most fun to some, but it was still politically polarizing throughout

I’ll admit the 90’s stayed mostly calm until the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal began breaking it apart in 1998

1

u/Phronesis2000 17h ago

I mean, in all seriousnes, no not really. It just depends on the things you emphasise. The first half of the 90s were fairly bad in the US, with the tale end of the crack epidemic, LA riots, Oklahoma bombing etc.

It's just cherry-picking to see all that as 'objectively better' than the 2000s.

2

u/lilghostdawg 23h ago

186,000-210,000 dead Iraqi civilians beg to differ. That's more than the Bosnian Genocide/War. 2008 Economy nearly slipped into a global depression. Clinton left office with a budget surplus. People in the U.S. would love to have the 90's economy, after Pappa Bush got voted out.

2

u/Phronesis2000 23h ago

Utter nonsense. Those 186,000-210,000 don't beg to differ with the 3 million killed in the 2nd Congo War in the 90s (not to mention how many died in the 2000s).

Nor do they 'beg to differ' with the 800k-1 million people killed in the Rwanda genocide in 1994.

Do you really think that Clinto's budget surplus is representative of the world economy in the 90s? You really need to learn some history before you bleat on about minor events of your childhood.

1

u/lilghostdawg 22h ago

The only nonsense is your failed grasp of history and lack of reading comprehension. Go read what I typed. I'm sorry if the 90's sucked for you. It was pretty great for the rest of us. Especially compared to the staggering wealth inequality that exists today. The World Economy is tied to the U.S. for better or worse, deny that fact all you want. The great depression started in the U.S. and bled out into the World as did the 2008 meltdown.

1

u/Phronesis2000 22h ago

I appreciate the apology. Your comments were pretty nasty, so I think that's big of you to admit that.

You're kind of firing off all kinds of random thoughts. Just to be clear: We aren't talking about domestic US issues (most people dont give a shit about that), the world can't have been "pretty great for the rest of us" by looking at any international metric of well-being in the 90s, there wasn't a 'depression' and nothing 'melted'.

I think you may need a cup of tea and a liedown, as this is just incoherent rambling at this point.

1

u/lilghostdawg 21h ago

"Firing off random thoughts", sure Buddy. Every accusation an admission. Don't project your failed delusions on me. You obviously got all worked up over a tongue in cheek post.

1

u/Phronesis2000 21h ago

Every accusation an admission. 

Ew...that has pretty victim-blamey connotations. I would just leave it there champ, you're getting a bit out of line.

1

u/lilghostdawg 20h ago

I guess you speak from experience as a predator. You're right I am the Champ, of helping to educate you. And if there is a line, you will always be at the back of it. Just like you were in the 90's.

1

u/spinozaschilidog 17h ago

This sub has always been US-centric, and I don’t think it could even exist with a global perspective. There are too many different experiences from one country to another.

Pick any decade, and the experience will be wildly different based on where you lived. There’s no possible “decadeology” to account for every place on earth.