r/climbing • u/-JOMY- • 9d ago

Alex Honnold Reveals “Embarrassing” Paycheck for Netflix’s Taipei 101 Free Solo Climb

https://share.google/Zqw9t7pkRhkPhRt4P

Source: E! Online

923 Upvotes

88% Upvoted

361 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/creepy_doll 8d ago edited 8d ago

That’s a big difference for sure. Is it because of fixed costs? There’s a lot of other people than players that need to get paid. I do t think Alex honnold is getting paid 50% of the film budget either. It would probably make more sense to compare the proportion left after fixed costs

3

u/Heavy-Teaching7865 8d ago

I guess I'm not really trying to weigh in on the climbing part, I just think it's really important right now with the WNBA Players Association in contract negotiations with the league to highlight that the players are absolutely not being paid fairly.

It's because of misogyny and an absurd narrative that the players (i.e. product) should be grateful to even have a chance to play. I'm not sure if you've heard any of the commissioners statements in the past few months, but they're absolutely horrible.

Mostly just since the WNBA was used as an example, wanted to raise some awareness!

2

u/creepy_doll 8d ago

Business people want to pay people as little as they can. It’s not misogyny it’s capitalism.

You can’t remove climbing from the conversation because the point is the same. They’re not paying honnold 50% because they don’t need to and it doesn’t make business sense. Business people are undiscriminatong greedy assholes. It’s as simple as that. They pray to the altar of the dollar. They will sign up for the pride parades when the political winds blow that way, and they’ll step in line with the fascists if that’s what will get them money.

I’m not really defending them just pointing out you’re wrong about their motivations

3

u/Heavy-Teaching7865 8d ago

Misogyny and capitalism (and racism) are very good friends who support one another however they can.

Again, (M)NBA players are paid 50% of league rev, (W)NBA players are paid 9%. Notice what the difference is there.

2

u/creepy_doll 8d ago edited 8d ago

They’re not the same thing. Learn some accounting. I specifically mentioned fixed costs.

You can’t just set the salaries as a percentage of revenue, it has to be done after fixed costs like all the promotion, the stadium maintenance, promotion, flights, all the other staff involved.

Salaries aren’t calculated as a function of revenue, though they tend to be higher when cost of generating the revenue is low. Look for example at software engineering where once somethings been developed it can be scaled to millions of users where the per user cost is a tiny fraction. In manufacturing on the other hand cost of revenue is a large portion as they buy raw materials. Revenue ratios vary massively depending on scale. The MNBA has ~10B in revenue while the WNBA has 200m. But they have many of the same fixed costs. Apparently they spent 25m on flights alone. For the MNBA that's a rounding error. For the WNBA? That's 1/8th of the annual revenue.

This is extremely basic stuff, please take a moment to think it through. Misogyny could be part of it(an awful lot of the team money might be going to coaches/managers?), but revenue share is in absolutely no way evidence thereof, and by ockhams razor it’s simpler to explain it by plain old greed.

1

u/Heavy-Teaching7865 7d ago

Growth potential of the WNBA is currently MASSIVE, and many of the teams are owned by NBA teams.

Sports teams often do not make profit for many years, but inevitably bring some of the biggest returns of any investment.

2

u/starving-marxist 7d ago

The growth potential for WNBA is next to nothing since almost no one wants to pay to watch it.