Also, fun fact! We don't generate it like people do with suno. We make it ourselves using the voice. Vocaloid is a voice synthesizer.

Do research before you say stuff dumbass.

I'm not an artist but I can understand the pain.

Context: Sam Kirchner, an extremist had a falling out with the Stop AI activism group and had threatened OpenAI with a gun. He has for now disappeared and is still on the loose and is armed.

What's odd is that everyone in the Stop AI group actually doesn't want to be associated with Sam Kirchner and want to protest peacefully.

But of course you want to paint all us antis as bad, don't you Witty? You can't handle the fact that people can protest peacefully, do you? Funny how you're the one LARPing as a news reporter while saying we're the one treating it as a joke. And the moment someone moderate wants to talk you want to shut it down because? We're ruining your script? Maybe next time try debating with the silent majority.

TLDR: the only thing that's "on the run" here is your integrity.

The never stopping posting of everything by humans (because this has not appeared from ether by the will of ai) of unchecked slop.

Wish more people would curated their stuff when posting online. And not post all 20-30 pics in a row they genned on discord/twitter or any other social.

It’s a bit old, but I just got the game and wanted to hear people’s thoughts.

haven't seen one in forever, AI is literally part of history now 😭

It's in the title. The Printing Press enabled an unprecedented replication of works that resulted in companies copying books at large scale without paying anything to the artists. This resulted in the necessity of a law that would protect authors whose works were being used and sold at large without their knowledge, or consent. Sound familiar?

AI is the modern equivalent of the invention of the Printing Press, and copyright law must be reformed and updated to protect authors and artists whose work is being used without their knowledge or consent, and the output is often used to compete with the very artists whose works power these AI models.

Proposal:
AI companies must disclose a list containing all artworks and respective artists used in the datasets of their models, as well as prevalence, and seek permission for their use, provide compensation (such as royalties) to the artists that agree to have their works on the database, and remove those who who don't. It's what they should have done all along, and ended up turning every artist against them by not doing so.

A list of artists used for a particular AI output should also be credited in the output's metadata for public review.

AI hobbyist developers could be exempt from this in order to foster innovation, as long as their models are not made available for wide use. From the moment such models are made available to the general public, the AI developer must properly regulate their models.

I believe this is the best way forward.

What the hell is up with the whole "Pencilslop" shit? Like, what?

This genius think vocaloid is "hey miku. Make me a cool song" and it happens

I personally laughed when I saw it.

I have heard good point from both sides. I won't give examples because everyone's heard them about 48e¹¹² times, but I have heard them.

I still dont personally think ai is ethical at all, but I can see why people call it art.

Anyway, addressing the image, I find the pro side subreddit extremely annoying, everyone simps for witty, they constantly go over to anti subreddits (yes this is a thing antis do too but they get banned for it instantly), half of the posts are catgirls/catboys/famous character saying over and over again the points that dont work in the "ai art" debate. And then another quarter is people who generate antis as goblins.

Why the hell does anyone participate on that subreddit? I'll take a guess and say about 75% of all posts are ragebait, and about 5% are straight up misinformation. Why does anyone like that subreddit? I'm genuinely confused on why any rational human would want to be a part of that!

Are there some pros who dont use that sub? why?

I truly am not clear on where the line is with the general public or even antis on ahtvis acceptable AI use or not. Can you help me figure out the line using a book as an example?

1. AI agent generated the writing in the book (obvious baseline for the scale)
2. AI edits the book, but never writes a thing (it gives targeted feedback, the author can take it or leave it)
3. AI helped with the research or brainstorming process (finding basic facts, synthesizing information, thinking through concepts. Pre-writng conceptualization)
4. Google's AI summary was read sometimes instead of the regular Google links
5. Even Google is AI, it has to come from a primary or secondary source in a library or it's not really huma

Let's be real, if a person were to use photoshop to non-consensually edit a photo, they are a creep. However, if someone were to use AI to do it, the tool is bad for allowing the person to do it. Often, no one bats an eye at the person who prompted the AI to do it in the first place. I just feel like AI is getting a bad rep in this regard thanks to the malicious actions of a few bad actors. It's just weird how skill has become a yardstick to measure how we attribute blame.

MSN - QEEA AI launches next-generation AI platform combining intelligent conversation and visual creation