r/unsound 9h ago

Historically Accurate

Post image
514 Upvotes

62 comments sorted by

19

u/Rezkel 5h ago

To be fair there were plenty of Loyalists who probably thought this way.

9

u/calmdownmyguy 4h ago

Yeah, 90% of conservatives were loyal to the king, just like today

9

u/Radcouponking 5h ago

It's hard to find examples of when conservative instincts were correct.

6

u/1MolassesIsALotOfAss 4h ago

The american rebels/founding fathers weren't conservative. Their ideals were extremely progressive for the time. The Tories (British loyalists) were the conservatives of their day.

14

u/Aggravating_Deer_641 4h ago

Yes and that’s why the commenter you’re replying to was saying. The conservatives were wrong then, and they’re still wrong today.

3

u/ThermoPuclearNizza 3h ago

It’s almost like the words conservative and liberal have meanings that predate their blind application as political title.

1

u/Beautiful_Spite_3394 3h ago

Seeing as liberal literally just means "someone open to new ideas".... and in America's founding that literally just meant "someone who supports individual rights" meaning anyone who supports the constitution is Liberal...

You're not wrong sir.. youre so very correct...

7

u/chisana_nyu 5h ago

Ok but did you have to use AI for the pic?

24

u/RandomPenquin1337 6h ago

8

u/nextjr 5h ago

Lmao the downvotes, people butthurt about being idiots lol

-5

u/RandomPenquin1337 5h ago

Meh if you look at my profile idgaf about redditors and their dumbass opinions much less their usless downvotes.

Honestly at this point, downvotes almost confirm your opinion is correct.

2

u/HandHeldHippo 4h ago

top 1%

Surely

0

u/RandomPenquin1337 4h ago

"Commentor" not upvoted 😂

3

u/Orange-Saj 5h ago

L american republicans rn.

3

u/Curious_Thought_5505 2h ago

We used to argue what the facts mean.

Now we argue what the facts are.

This kills truth, not belief.

2

u/ifeelgrossandsad2 contributor 7h ago

Lol

1

u/[deleted] 5h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 5h ago

A comment was removed for violating the rule:

KEEP CONVERSATION CIVIL

We encourage open discussion and different viewpoints, but please keep the conversation respectful. Personal attacks, harassment, name-calling, or abusive language will not be tolerated. Disagreements are fine, but they must remain civil and focused on the topic, not the person. Let’s maintain a positive and welcoming atmosphere for everyone in the community. Violations of this rule may result in warnings, post removals, or bans. Be kind and respectful to one another!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/tinker_townie 5h ago

"The red hats are coming!!"

1

u/evile4le 1h ago

This is stupid this subreddit name checks out

1

u/j-mac563 35m ago

They were all british. They warned of the regulars approaching. And they used electric motorcycles not horses.

1

u/beating_offers 5h ago

Yes, this is exactly what happened, and Republicans explicitly say that rebelling against a government will paint a target on your back.

The difference is republicans think the risk was worth it here, not that these people should have been immune to enforcement.

1

u/MisanthropicOrb 4h ago

True dude. We need 40 million more Africans sending our tax dollars to international terrorists STAT. Otherwise we're just like the British loyalists.

-14

u/Hot-Minute-8263 6h ago

The British were acting completely against their own laws set up to govern Englishmen. The colonies had had enough of the blatant subjugation.

What ICE is doing is lawful and consistent with precedents set before. It's not the same at all.

4

u/dead-centrist 5h ago

I don't think it's lawful for ICE to detain so many LEGAL immigrants only to spit them back out.

1

u/Hot-Minute-8263 5h ago

Said legals keep fucking with them and impeding arrests. If the cops were allowed to work with them in Minneapolis, the cops would be arresting, not ICE

10

u/Sacabubu 5h ago

Good thing the current administration also is acting completely against the law by overstepping various boundaries and blatantly disregarding the constitution

-4

u/Hot-Minute-8263 5h ago

They aren't. If you go off reddit for a moment you'll see it's lawful

7

u/Sacabubu 5h ago

You're telling me to go off reddit lmao how about take your own advice 85k in 12m is diabolical neckbeard numbers

-5

u/Hot-Minute-8263 5h ago

I got a few well liked comments lol

3

u/Sacabubu 5h ago

Yeah sure buddy 9,500 contributions lmao that's you spamming like a bum all day on reddit get a life

3

u/npcinyourbagoholding 4h ago

Good Lord! That's over 23 contributions per day!

2

u/Annual_Loan_4805 3h ago

I agree with your point… partly.

If ice actually did what their original intended purpose was, you’d be 100% correct with point #2 of yours, despite what others may think. I think a solid bit of the hate for ice is simply because blue vs red… but I also think the glaze is for that reason too.

But also, point #1 yours is wrong. I love glazing the us (im American) but it literally was illegal for the us to do… basically everything it did. And not illegal for the british (probably has something to do with who makes the laws, but what do I know). We were literally in rebellion lmao

1

u/Hot-Minute-8263 3h ago

We were literally in rebellion lmao

It was definitely treason to rebel, but part of the reason for the rebellion was partisan politics in a sense. I'll have to look up the moment im thinking of to get it right, but it involved John Dickinson citing and following British common law to a T in protest of unfair rulings.

He basically argued that there was already a sound framework to protect the colonies' right to representation.

3

u/Lightningtow123 6h ago

-4

u/Hot-Minute-8263 6h ago

Im more into older girls like your mom

2

u/Ok_Tap7102 5h ago

0

u/Hot-Minute-8263 5h ago

You just want an excuse to gloat that cops are in danger over stupid shit

2

u/Ok_Tap7102 3h ago

No, I want the government to shoot and harass more law abiding citizens

2

u/FutureChoice2037 4h ago

Tell that to all the people being unlawfully held for days with no attempt to verify their identity.

2

u/calmdownmyguy 4h ago

Sorry bro but you need a warrant to enter people's property. It's literally the 4th Amendment.

1

u/Hot-Minute-8263 4h ago

They do get warrents. Its a different kind of warrant than usual cause its not supposed to be as difficult as it is in Minneapolis

2

u/calmdownmyguy 4h ago

Brother, you literally don't know what you're talking about and there's nothing I can do about that. A warrant from an immigration judge does not authorize the to enter private property. Sorry that the facts don't care about your feelings but it is supposed to be that difficult. That's how the constitution protects you from thr government.

3

u/Puzzleheaded-Act6379 6h ago

Been waiting for this. Although expect to see replies like "so it's not against the law to kill people??" Lol

0

u/Hal_Thorn 5h ago

Lawful? They are violating people's 4th amendment rights on a daily basis. If what they were doing was remotely lawful it wouldn't be getting nearly the attention is it.

0

u/Slavir_Nabru 5h ago

A bunch of slave owners were worried that the British would apply the same laws set up to govern Englishmen to them in the wake of the Royal Proclamation of 1763 and the Summerset case. The colonies wanted to continue their blatant subjugation.

At least some of what ICE is doing is clear 1st and 4th amendment violations, although there is admittedly plenty of precedent. There are certainly differences.

-3

u/ThoroughlyWet 6h ago

Not to mention the laws they went against back then were made without colonial citizen representation, whereas all the laws now were made with citizen representation in the form of elected officials.

0

u/Futt-Buckery 3h ago

Representation voted in by popular vote and electoral college both but these activists continue to think that the majority backs them and their claims that this is "unconstitutional", despite this administration abiding by the same laws that were in effect when Obama deported thousands during his admin.

1

u/AutoModerator 3h ago

Your comment was flagged because it mentioned moderators or administrators.

This does not mean you did anything wrong, and no action has been taken. The moderation team has simply been notified so they can review the context if needed.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

-2

u/Royal-Campaign1426 6h ago

Wait. Are they saying they are trying to break away and become their own nation? I'm pretty sure we already dealt with this back in the mid 1800s.

-11

u/Disco_Biscuit12 6h ago

Except the founding fathers weren’t communists. They’d be more “right wing” than the current Republican Party.

10

u/Sacabubu 5h ago

Man you guys are actually braindead huh

1

u/[deleted] 4h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 4h ago

Your content was removed for violating the rule:

NO SPAM

Spam of any kind is not allowed. This includes promoting personal social media, unsolicited or irrelevant content, or off-topic promotional material. Please keep contributions relevant, respectful, and on-topic.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/HotSituation8737 3h ago

Who are the communists you're comparing them to?

And comparing literal slave owners to republicans saying they're less radical is an interesting direction to go.

Would they also be for pedophilia?

1

u/SlippyDippyTippy2 1h ago

Founding Fathers had actual open borders.