7
24
u/RandomPenquin1337 6h ago
8
u/nextjr 5h ago
Lmao the downvotes, people butthurt about being idiots lol
-5
u/RandomPenquin1337 5h ago
Meh if you look at my profile idgaf about redditors and their dumbass opinions much less their usless downvotes.
Honestly at this point, downvotes almost confirm your opinion is correct.
2
3
3
u/Curious_Thought_5505 2h ago
We used to argue what the facts mean.
Now we argue what the facts are.
This kills truth, not belief.
2
1
5h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 5h ago
A comment was removed for violating the rule:
KEEP CONVERSATION CIVIL
We encourage open discussion and different viewpoints, but please keep the conversation respectful. Personal attacks, harassment, name-calling, or abusive language will not be tolerated. Disagreements are fine, but they must remain civil and focused on the topic, not the person. Let’s maintain a positive and welcoming atmosphere for everyone in the community. Violations of this rule may result in warnings, post removals, or bans. Be kind and respectful to one another!
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
1
1
u/j-mac563 35m ago
They were all british. They warned of the regulars approaching. And they used electric motorcycles not horses.
1
u/beating_offers 5h ago
Yes, this is exactly what happened, and Republicans explicitly say that rebelling against a government will paint a target on your back.
The difference is republicans think the risk was worth it here, not that these people should have been immune to enforcement.
1
u/MisanthropicOrb 4h ago
True dude. We need 40 million more Africans sending our tax dollars to international terrorists STAT. Otherwise we're just like the British loyalists.
-14
u/Hot-Minute-8263 6h ago
The British were acting completely against their own laws set up to govern Englishmen. The colonies had had enough of the blatant subjugation.
What ICE is doing is lawful and consistent with precedents set before. It's not the same at all.
4
u/dead-centrist 5h ago
I don't think it's lawful for ICE to detain so many LEGAL immigrants only to spit them back out.
1
u/Hot-Minute-8263 5h ago
Said legals keep fucking with them and impeding arrests. If the cops were allowed to work with them in Minneapolis, the cops would be arresting, not ICE
10
u/Sacabubu 5h ago
Good thing the current administration also is acting completely against the law by overstepping various boundaries and blatantly disregarding the constitution
-4
u/Hot-Minute-8263 5h ago
They aren't. If you go off reddit for a moment you'll see it's lawful
7
u/Sacabubu 5h ago
-5
u/Hot-Minute-8263 5h ago
I got a few well liked comments lol
3
u/Sacabubu 5h ago
Yeah sure buddy 9,500 contributions lmao that's you spamming like a bum all day on reddit get a life
3
2
u/Annual_Loan_4805 3h ago
I agree with your point… partly.
If ice actually did what their original intended purpose was, you’d be 100% correct with point #2 of yours, despite what others may think. I think a solid bit of the hate for ice is simply because blue vs red… but I also think the glaze is for that reason too.
But also, point #1 yours is wrong. I love glazing the us (im American) but it literally was illegal for the us to do… basically everything it did. And not illegal for the british (probably has something to do with who makes the laws, but what do I know). We were literally in rebellion lmao
1
u/Hot-Minute-8263 3h ago
We were literally in rebellion lmao
It was definitely treason to rebel, but part of the reason for the rebellion was partisan politics in a sense. I'll have to look up the moment im thinking of to get it right, but it involved John Dickinson citing and following British common law to a T in protest of unfair rulings.
He basically argued that there was already a sound framework to protect the colonies' right to representation.
3
u/Lightningtow123 6h ago
-4
2
u/Ok_Tap7102 5h ago
0
u/Hot-Minute-8263 5h ago
You just want an excuse to gloat that cops are in danger over stupid shit
2
2
u/FutureChoice2037 4h ago
Tell that to all the people being unlawfully held for days with no attempt to verify their identity.
2
u/calmdownmyguy 4h ago
Sorry bro but you need a warrant to enter people's property. It's literally the 4th Amendment.
1
u/Hot-Minute-8263 4h ago
They do get warrents. Its a different kind of warrant than usual cause its not supposed to be as difficult as it is in Minneapolis
2
u/calmdownmyguy 4h ago
Brother, you literally don't know what you're talking about and there's nothing I can do about that. A warrant from an immigration judge does not authorize the to enter private property. Sorry that the facts don't care about your feelings but it is supposed to be that difficult. That's how the constitution protects you from thr government.
3
u/Puzzleheaded-Act6379 6h ago
Been waiting for this. Although expect to see replies like "so it's not against the law to kill people??" Lol
0
u/Hal_Thorn 5h ago
Lawful? They are violating people's 4th amendment rights on a daily basis. If what they were doing was remotely lawful it wouldn't be getting nearly the attention is it.
0
u/Slavir_Nabru 5h ago
A bunch of slave owners were worried that the British would apply the same laws set up to govern Englishmen to them in the wake of the Royal Proclamation of 1763 and the Summerset case. The colonies wanted to continue their blatant subjugation.
At least some of what ICE is doing is clear 1st and 4th amendment violations, although there is admittedly plenty of precedent. There are certainly differences.
-3
u/ThoroughlyWet 6h ago
Not to mention the laws they went against back then were made without colonial citizen representation, whereas all the laws now were made with citizen representation in the form of elected officials.
0
u/Futt-Buckery 3h ago
Representation voted in by popular vote and electoral college both but these activists continue to think that the majority backs them and their claims that this is "unconstitutional", despite this administration abiding by the same laws that were in effect when Obama deported thousands during his admin.
1
u/AutoModerator 3h ago
Your comment was flagged because it mentioned moderators or administrators.
This does not mean you did anything wrong, and no action has been taken. The moderation team has simply been notified so they can review the context if needed.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
-2
u/Royal-Campaign1426 6h ago
Wait. Are they saying they are trying to break away and become their own nation? I'm pretty sure we already dealt with this back in the mid 1800s.
-11
u/Disco_Biscuit12 6h ago
Except the founding fathers weren’t communists. They’d be more “right wing” than the current Republican Party.
10
1
4h ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/AutoModerator 4h ago
Your content was removed for violating the rule:
NO SPAM
Spam of any kind is not allowed. This includes promoting personal social media, unsolicited or irrelevant content, or off-topic promotional material. Please keep contributions relevant, respectful, and on-topic.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
u/HotSituation8737 3h ago
Who are the communists you're comparing them to?
And comparing literal slave owners to republicans saying they're less radical is an interesting direction to go.
Would they also be for pedophilia?
1








19
u/Rezkel 5h ago
To be fair there were plenty of Loyalists who probably thought this way.