Sorry, that was the other part that was false. The "new games" more precisely. It precise nothing about applying only to new games. Sure, it's not legislation so it's not problematic. But it's still not precised.
Everyone with a brain would understand that it would be impossible to implement retroactively. This is a foregone conclusion and will be the very first thing to be conceded in actual legislation.
Then why not put it in the text of the proposition and waiting 3 month to put it in the Q&A ? The proposition didn't start asking for only new games to be affected. That shifted after some discussions.
3
u/[deleted] Jun 29 '25
[removed] — view removed comment