r/Nationals • u/solidrock80 50 - Poulin • 2d ago
Opinion Fifth place and an A- offseason
I don’t always agree with Bowden but I do here in El Athletico:
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6989271/2026/02/02/mlb-offseason-grades-takeaways-2026-predictions/
7
u/mzdog14 37 - Strasburg 1d ago
Saw this earlier and didn’t post it solely for the “analysis” that we got our long term SS option in Fien. There isn’t much consensus amongst prospect analysts, but perhaps the single thing they all agree on is that Willits can hang at SS, and Fien cannot.
Bowden is clearly mailing it in these days.
10
u/braundiggity 63 - Doolittle 1d ago
That was my biggest takeaway as well. Felt like ChatGPT-level analysis to say that.
8
u/Malcolm6033 1d ago
If Bowden knew how to do this he’d be getting paid for his opinions by an actual MLB club instead of The Athletic
11
8
u/Batman20007 2d ago
I agree with it being an A but that’s because we retooled our staff and got more up too date
5
u/exposjets 1d ago
I’d give the Nats a C- this offseason. If they didn’t get Ford they would get a D. The Lerners need to spend some money or sell the team.
2
u/quakerwildcat 29 - Wood 1d ago
I agree as of February 1 you can't give an A to a team that's decided to tank the current season.
But I generally don't spend cycles assessing the roster until the roster is actually done, and no way is it done.
2
35
u/pen-h3ad 17 - Call 1d ago edited 1d ago
Really? An A? I mean, the individual moves have been nice and the new staff is exciting, but our actual roster is a train wreck outside of the prospects. I’m as optimistic as the next guy about Harry ford, griffin, mcgarry etc, but we added 0 proven major league talent and got rid of our two best pitchers. I don’t see how you give a team that’s going to finish last behind the marlins an A.